RE: Violation of IETF process (was: Second Last Call: <draft-ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism: SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed Standard)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of SM
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 11:58 PM
> To: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: sieve@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Violation of IETF process (was: Second Last Call: <draft-
> ietf-sieve-notify-sip-message-08.txt> (Sieve Notification Mechanism:
> SIP MESSAGE) to Proposed Standard)
> 
> The violation has a negative impact on the IETF (see comment from Dave
> Crocker on this thread).  It raises questions which should not be
> asked.

Oh, I don't agree with that last bit at all.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]