On 1/5/2012 2:05 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. As Ray Pelletier said on this list earlier, I have been tasked with creating a set of requirements for the IETF's remote participation system (RPS). The first draft is now at <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-genarea-rps-reqs-00>. The discussion of the requirements is happening on the "vmeet" mailing list; see <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>. > > This first draft compiles many (but certainly not all!) of the comments I have heard so far, but I expect it to change a fair amount in the coming months. If you are active in the IETF, even if you rarely or never come to IETF meetings, your input is welcome. > > --Paul Hoffman The key comment should be "That one can fully participate without having to bear the expense of continuous travel to the various global spots the ISOC and IETF place the meetings". The issue is whether direct in-person participation is necessary and to date it has been a mandatory part of holding office inside the IETF so this also is a concern with how it mandates access for the ADA as well. Todd > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- Todd S. Glassey This is from my personal email account and any materials from this account come with personal disclaimers. Further I OPT OUT of any and all commercial emailings. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf