* Thomas Roessler wrote: >I'm not interested in a game of process nomics. If you are not interested in discussing whether it was "premature ... to request publication of this document as an RFC" then don't suggest that it was? The IETF is currently discussing proper procedures for this kind of third-party registration in various places like "happiana", you will excuse that some of us are interested in finding suitable guidelines. >Speaking as liaison, I've already pointed you at the appropriate people >to ask for review. This being an individual, informational draft, I >think it's fair to expect the submitter to go and secure the appropriate >review. I think it's fair to expect you to keep people in the W3C apprised about developments in the IETF relevant to their work, and I think it's fair to dismiss your opinion in this matter given that you don't want to dis- cuss it. Mykyta Yevstifeyev made a draft, interested parties were made aware of the draft, and after some weeks with no comments from them, as far as I am aware, Mykyta Yevstifeyev asked for publication of the draft as RFC. I don't think there is anything wrong with that. If you disagree perhaps you can find someone to argue your point on the "happiana" list so we can give better guidance to our fellow community members. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@xxxxxxxxxxxx · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf