Re: Last Call: <draft-yevstifeyev-disclosure-relation-00.txt> (The 'disclosure' Link Relation Type) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-12-27 07:52, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
Hello,

I'd like to seek consensus on separating the semantics of link
relation for separate disclosure and a list thereof, correspondingly
defining two link relations - 'disclosure' and 'disclosure-list'.  You
may see my edits made to Section 2 of the doc. below, which I'm
proposing:

2. 'disclosure' Link Relation Type

    Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI
    [RFC5988] MUST refer to a particular patent disclosure made with
    respect to the material being referenced by context IRI.

3. 'disclosure-list' Link Relation Type

    Whenever the 'disclosure' relation is defined, the target IRI MUST
    designate a list of patent disclosures made with respect to the
    material being referenced by context IRI.

As the doc. is in Last Call now, in order not to initiate a new one,
please comment on these changes before January 6, so that I could know
which version I should submit for IESG evaluation.
...

I don't see a compelling reason to distinguish both.

Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]