On Dec 21, 2011, at 1:06 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > > Maybe I misunderstood your concern. The operator's server to the operator's routers only involves the operator's internal network. While I would personally prefer a mandatory-to-implement mechanism, I can see that operators do not necessarily want prescriptive statements on this part of the specification. Hahhh.. I don't see a requirement that says that the RPKI cache much be on the local operators network, else you just created an industry for 60k+ caches, at least(!).. Additionally, we should apply this to all IGP work? Why are we doing KARP? And why no bi-lateral, so we don't really need transport protections at all in eBGP? Not subscribing to this... -danny _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf