Also, in general, we have operated on the basis that if people aren't interested enough in a work item or draft to actually work on it or review it, then the work item isn't really important to the community. This even applies to drafts that I write, if nobody is interested ;-). When all work items in the IETF reach that state, we can all get on with our lives. Regards Brian On 2011-12-21 05:38, Donald Eastlake wrote: > The end of year Holiday season is not generally known as a time when > lots of work gets done. > > Thanks, > Donald > ============================= > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA > d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:21 AM, t.petch <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> .. I knew how to move things forward. Earlier this year, the discussion was >> about how meetings might be reorganised to make more happen, and I commented >> that six meetings a year - no need to attend them - might produce six spurts of >> activity in a 12 month period instead of three. >> >> Post-Taipei, most of the WG I track, with the notable exception of the terrible >> twins of v6, seem to be moribund; WGLC go unanswered, calls for adoption lie >> fallow, those edits that would be made as soon as the window opened again remain >> unmade, ... >> >> The IESG is evidently working hard, but at the lower strata, ... >> >> For Christmas, I wish ... >> >> Tom Petch >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf mailing list >> Ietf@xxxxxxxx >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf