Re: Consensus Call (Update): draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Donley <C.Donley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Chris> We're requesting a /10, not a /12 or /15 (devices attached to
    Chris> one CGN might use the whole /15).  Such an allocation would
    Chris> be too small for a regional CGN deployment at a larger ISP,
    Chris> and would likely result in double-CGN.  Shared CGN Space
    Chris> really needs to be a /10.

    Chris> Second, many ISPs do not control customer home network
    Chris> addressing decisions.  It is not feasible to tell a customer
    Chris> to renumber, especially when the customer is legitimately
    Chris> using RFC1918 space in accordance with the RFC.

So, this is being forced on existing customers, or is being used for new
customers only?   

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition. 


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]