On 12/8/11 12:18 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > That said, the best I can see for this report is "held for document > update." It's one of those things that's not worth spending time on, > and, as Thomas says, the "should" language makes it fine as it is. +1. There's work happening in the background on 5226bis. Let those authors sort it out. :) Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf