On 12/7/2011 6:09 AM, George, Wes wrote:
I'm also open to suggestions as to the appropriate publication track for thisdocument, whether I should look to have it sponsored as a GenArea doc or simply> put it forward as an individual submission.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-travel-faq
I suggest that this be processed as an individual submission. It will still get IETF review but I believe it does not require the level of active consensus by a working group (pseudo or otherwise) that a typical technical specification does.
However I suggest that the document cast itself as a snapshot of an on-going documentation process, with the "master" copy being an IETF Wiki; the document should contain a point to the wiki.
I'll also suggest that there be an on-going mailing list for discussing meeting logistics issues, rather than a different mailing list for each meeting. (ietf-meeting?)
The current contents -- a template of information to be developed -- looks quite good. But it can't be "complete", and the definition of "complete" is likely to change frequently. That's a perfect candidate for a wiki effort.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf