Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > Renumbering the internal network would be completely silly. > > You certainly do not want any interruptions of the local network traffic > > just because you frequently change the address on the external interface for > > privacy reasons. > > This is why ULAs are useful. People just need to get used to the fact > that IPv6 addresses derived from ISPs will change from time to time, > and that you will have several of them. This is not your grandfather's > TCP/IP. > > This is also why we have the MIF, HOMENET and 6RENUM WGs. As long as the current IPv4 characteristics are not transparently available with IPv6, it will probably deter adoption of IPv6 for the installed base. I certainly feel fine with IPv4, and would probably feel more comfortable with IPv4 behind CGN than with what is currently available as IPv6. -Martin _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf