I disagree with the document shepherd's evaluation of this document. This document sets out to standardize an additional code point to support a type of OAM for MPLS, and as such the MPLS WG must review the document for technical correctness. As far as I understand things, all MPLS documents that have requested ACH code points to-date have been on the standards track with MPLS expert WG review, and so this one should as well. --Tom _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf