On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Chris Donley <C.Donley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It also works in a real production deployment in a real network. As I noted earlier. So oppose to claims that it does not work, I can let you know that it in fact works.
regards,
Victor K
Draft-donley-nat444-impacts-03:
+--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------------+----------+
| Skype video | Pass | Pass | Pass | Pass | |
| chat
+--------------+--------+--------+--------+--------------+----------+
It also works in a real production deployment in a real network. As I noted earlier. So oppose to claims that it does not work, I can let you know that it in fact works.
regards,
Victor K
We tested it. Skype worked in our lab through CGN.
Chris
On 11/30/11 7:21 AM, "Ronald Bonica" <rbonica@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Folks,
>
>Can anyone present empirical evidence that skype will break? I have heard
>claims in both directions.
>
> Ron
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
>> Mark Andrews
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:50 PM
>> To: Randy Bush
>> Cc: IETF Disgust
>> Subject: Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request
>>
>>
>> In message <m2sjl644h3.wl%randy@xxxxxxx>, Randy Bush writes:
>> > anyone who thinks this will not be used as 1918 space should share
>> > what they are smoking. the question is not if, but rather how many
>> > milliseconds before it is. that is the operational reality.
>>
>> And what harm to others does that cause? If a ISP is using this and
>> the customer is using this rather than RFC 1918 space then they only
>> have themselves to blame for operational problems it causes.
>>
>> > and we should have a betting pool on how long before it is leaked
>> > into a measure such as route-views.
>>
>> And users would be advised to filter routes for it the same as they
>> should be filtering routes for other space they are using.
>>
>> > and all this is aside from the pnp, skype, ... and other breakage.
>> > and, imiho, we can screw ipv4 life support.
>>
>> skype etc. will learn. This does prevent the breakage it just makes
>> it more controlled. What's the bet Skype has a patched released
>> within a week of this being made available?
>>
>> > this has become a contest of wills, not a technical discussion.
>> --
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>_______________________________________________
>Ietf mailing list
>Ietf@xxxxxxxx
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf