Folks,
Can anyone present empirical evidence that skype will break? I have heard claims in both directions.
Ron
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Mark Andrews
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:50 PM
> To: Randy Bush
> Cc: IETF Disgust
> Subject: Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request
>
>
> In message <m2sjl644h3.wl%randy@xxxxxxx>, Randy Bush writes:
> > anyone who thinks this will not be used as 1918 space should share
> > what they are smoking. the question is not if, but rather how many
> > milliseconds before it is. that is the operational reality.
>
> And what harm to others does that cause? If a ISP is using this and
> the customer is using this rather than RFC 1918 space then they only
> have themselves to blame for operational problems it causes.
>
> > and we should have a betting pool on how long before it is leaked
> > into a measure such as route-views.
>
> And users would be advised to filter routes for it the same as they
> should be filtering routes for other space they are using.
>
> > and all this is aside from the pnp, skype, ... and other breakage.
> > and, imiho, we can screw ipv4 life support.
>
> skype etc. will learn. This does prevent the breakage it just makes
> it more controlled. What's the bet Skype has a patched released
> within a week of this being made available?
>
> > this has become a contest of wills, not a technical discussion.
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf