Hi, Yaakov,
I'm not the right guy to answer this, but I believe the right guy would
say that when we are asked for evidence about prior art, it would be
more helpful if you could actually read the presentations from the
working group meeting where somebody's invention was discussed by other
people three years before the data of the "invention".
I'm not defending that POV, only repeating what I believe the answer to be.
Spencer
On 11/17/2011 8:06 AM, Yaakov Stein wrote:
Martin
Where does the "note well" say that any contribution needs to be readable 10 years hence ?
It says that if you submit/say something that it is under the IPR stipulations,
and it says that the participant is deemed to have accepted rules of practice
including that what is said/submitted may be made public.
It does not say that everything that I say in a session must be transcribed and saved in ASCII,
and what I present in slides is no different from what I say.
Y(J)S
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf