+1 I also wonder how the ADs manage to read the documents for their own WGs when the agendas are this late. It's a lot of reading. On Nov 7, 2011, at 11:24 PM, SM wrote: > Hello, > > "Since it is important that working group members have adequate time to review all documents", it would be good if relevant WG documents are made available at least two weeks before the start of the WG session. Could the IESG "please do something" so that participants have adequate time to review such documents? > > The following WGs have not published any agenda yet: > > 1. RADEXT > 2. SOFTWIRE > 3. OPSEC > 4. CUSS cuss - got canceled .... > 5. FORCES > 6. TSVWG > 7. OPSAWG > 8. IDR > 9. PPSP > 10. PKIX > 11. REPUTE (new WG) > 12. MBONED > 13. CONEX > 14. TICTOC > 15. ANCP > 16. GROW > 17. LISP > 18. MULTRANS (BoF) > 19. KRB-WG > > Will the above sessions, excluding exceptional cases, be cancelled? > > Regards, > -sm > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf