On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Olaf Kolkman <olaf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would not call them liaisons (as they do not liaise) but advisors.
On Sep 20, 2011, at 6:25 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> - Olaf's wording be changed to make the IAB Chair, IETF Chair and ISOC CEO into ex-officio and non-voting Liaisons to the IAOC and the Trust.
>
> - The TAP then be modified to recognize the status of these new ex-officio and non-voting Liaisons. These Liaisons are not IAOC members, thus not Trustees.
>
WFM
The Trust would need to commit to allowing these advisors to join their meetings too. But that can be done in other ways than the Trust Agreement.
> With this procedure, I see no reason to modify the Trust Agreement.
(so yes, I agree with this line of thought)
Obviously this all assumes there is a consensus for changing the I* chairs role
Yes. And that should include prior agreement by the Trustees to make this change. (As with any last call, if the Trustees have objections,
they should be dealt with before the RFC is published.) I would be glad to schedule such a discussion and vote at an appropriate time, assuming I am still Chair at that time.
Regards
Marshall
--Olaf
________________________________________________________
Olaf M. Kolkman NLnet Labs
http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf