Re: Last Call: <draft-housley-two-maturity-levels-08.txt> (Reducing the Standards Track to Two Maturity Levels) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Thursday, September 01, 2011 08:10 -0700 Dave CROCKER
<dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>...
> Folks should remember that this is a system that has been
> functioning quite well for some decades and I am not aware of
> any recent emergencies that justify starting over or making
> major changes.
> 
> The policy when seeking to change an established, essential,
> well-running systems is to make as /few/ changes as possible,
> not as /many/...
> 
> Ideally, this means making no changes at all, of course.  That
> is, any proposal for a change MUST explain why the change is
> /essential/.

I agree completely.

Please apply this logic to draft-housley-two-maturity-levels, of
which you are a co-author.

     john



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]