Re: 2119bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Keith Moore
<moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Eric Burger wrote:
>
>> I would offer that ANY construction of SHOULD without an UNLESS is a MAY.
>
> The essential beauty of SHOULD is that it gets specification writers and
> working groups out of the all-too-common rathole of trying to anticipate and
> nail down every exceptional case.
> Keith

+1,  and thats the problem with this new interpretation and its
unwritten form has already been used in a WG to label a group
participants as 2119 illiterates and any software that has implemented
a SHOULD as already non-compliant.

-- 
hls
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]