18.08.2011 10:06, S Moonesamy wrote:
Hi Mykyta,
At 09:21 17-08-2011, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
IANA commented that it should be clear that "the registry" refers to
SMTP Service
Extensions (http://www.iana.org/assignments/mail-parameters); but the
registry there
From the write-up:
The entry in the SMTP Service Extensions registry for RFC 4409 should
be updated to reference this document. The reference for Submit (RFC
2476) should be updated to point to this document. The registry should
be updated to reflect the changed and new entries in Section 7.
"the registry" in the above should be read as "the SMTP Service
Extensions registry".
seems to have other format compared to Table 1:
+------------------+------------------+-----------+-----------------+
| Keyword | Name | Submissio |
Reference |
| | | n
| |
please compare with
Keywords Description
Reference Note
So how is this table going to be incorporated in the aforementioned
registry?
The following extract is from Section 7.1 of RFC 2476:
RFC Name Submission Reference
---- --------------- ---------- ------------------
2197 Pipelining SHOULD [PIPELINING]
2034 Error Codes SHOULD [CODES-EXTENSION]
1985 ETRN MUST NOT [ETRN]
This is from Section 7.1 of RFC 4409:
Keyword Name Submission Reference
---------- -------------------------- ---------- ----------------
PIPELINING Pipelining SHOULD [PIPELINING]
ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES Enhanced Status Codes SHOULD [CODES-EXTENSION]
ETRN Extended Turn MUST NOT [ETRN]
And finally from Section 7.1 of draft-ietf-yam-rfc4409bis-02:
| Keyword | Name | Submissio | Reference |
| | | n | |
+------------------+------------------+-----------+-----------------+
| PIPELINING | Pipelining | SHOULD | [PIPELINING] |
| ENHANCEDSTATUSCO | Enhanced Status | SHOULD | [CODES-EXTENSIO |
| DES | Codes | | N] |
| ETRN | Extended Turn | MUST NOT | [ETRN] |
The table has been in two previous RFCs. It was not a problem then.
Neither RFC 2476 nor RFC 4409 asked IANA to make changes according to
the contents of these tables; but this draft does. 4409 and its
predecessor just mentioned which are eligible for use with submission.
Mykyta
It should not be a problem now. Section 10 of the draft mentions how
the table is going to be incorporated. The document editors will
follow up on this editorial matter.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf