Re: IESG voting procedures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> And I think in that case, there is
>> no way that one or two ADs should be able to block something
>> because they don't like it, *unless* they can convince the rest
>> of the IESG that the document is harmful.
> 
> Convincing the entire IESG is a very high barrier, especially when typically, most of the IESG just wants the issue to go away.    It might happen for a significant architectural issue, perhaps, but not for an area-specific technical flaw. 

The current procedures do not require the AD that has found the flaw to convince the whole IESG that it is a flaw.  One other AD is sufficient,

Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]