Re: IESG voting procedures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2011-08-14, Keith Moore wrote:

> 2. Even if the document is approved over the AD's objection, I
> think it's completely unacceptable to bury the AD's technical
> objection.  Expecting the AD to change his Discuss to an
> Abstain is dishonesty on the part of the organization.

It sure sounds like if the status is renamed: 

   Disagree-But-Overruled

the annoyance becomes much smaller.

(Just my 2 cents)

-- 
Bill McQuillan <McQuilWP@xxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]