James, If I remember correctly, you mentioned a bit ago that your job required you had native IPv6 at home. Question: Does an ISP providing you IPv6 out of the CPE box (meaning, without any software other than dual-stack on the hosts) qualify as native IPv6 if, behind the scenes, they use a tunnel broker, or 6rd? > james woodyatt wrote: > p1. Those numbers are badly outdated. What is your reading on 6rd numbers? And if these numbers are badly outdated, where do you place the MacOS IPv6 traffic distribution today? > p3. Recent measurements of hits originating from Mac OS X > hosts on 6to4 prefixed networks are dramatically smaller > than when those measurements were taken, because Apple has > updated Mac OS X 10.6 and 10.7 with significantly different > behavior that will avoid using broken or underperforming > 6to4 links. So where does the new behavior switch the traffic to, from 10.6 to 10.7? Back to IPv4? Or some other method? Maybe Apple is using Teredo? (ducks) :P > [..] the total world IPv6 traffic now, which again is an > embarrassingly small fraction of global Internet traffic. That is another debate. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf