James, > james woodyatt wrote: > I now feel compelled to reiterate that I would prefer a more > controlled phase-out plan than, "equipment vendors and operators > are free to commence the destruction of 6to4 at their individual > convenience and without further warning to the user community." According to this: http://www.pam2010.ethz.ch/papers/full-length/15.pdf Slightly less than 50% of IPv6 traffic comes from a MacOS client (fig 3); about 90% MacOS hits is 6to4, which possibly means (to me) that this piece of 6to4 MacOS software of yours represents a third of global IPv6 traffic. Would you care to comment on the numbers? Also, according to Cisco's blog (that links to the document above): http://blogs.cisco.com/sp/france-is-famous-for-fine-wine-cheese-and-now- ipv6/ -or- http://tinyurl.com/5u3eorn "France is responsible for more than half of current IPv6 traffic worldwide"; I can positively confirm that Free (AS12322) that contributes to most of the French IPv6 native hits is delivering "native" IPv6 to their eyeballs using 6rd and that they are indeed the 800-pound gorilla of French IPv6 traffic, no contest. So, a third of IPv6 traffic is James' MacOS 6to4 software, another third is AS12322's 6rd (which, given recent comments, is indeed 6to4-bis) and we want to declare 6to4 historic? Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf