>>> Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> Since 6to4 is a transition mechanism it has no long >>> term future *by definition*. Even if someone chooses >>> to design a v2, who is going to implement it? free.fr, which is a third of the worldwide IPv6 traffic. >> Fred Baker wrote: >> Actually, I think one could argue pretty >> effectively that 6rd is 6to4-bis. Indeed, and it also is a transition mechanism for the very same reasons that 6to4 is. > Keith Moore wrote: > only if you're confused about the use cases for each. Even if there are different use cases indeed (as you explained it very well yourself) you can't deny that 6rd is 6to4-bis. The difference is in who configures/manages it, not how it works; the 6rd code base is a superset of the 6to4. The difference is more a matter of network design than core protocol. Michel. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf