> -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John C Klensin > Sent: Friday, July 15, 2011 2:02 PM > To: Brian E Carpenter > Cc: v6ops@xxxxxxxx; IETF Discussion > Subject: Re: Another look at 6to4 (and other IPv6 transition issues) > > Position #2: How the IETF classifies things makes very little > difference in this space because people will follow advice that > seems sensible and ignore everything else. If so, it makes > little difference how your document is approved or where it is > published. For example, it could have come through the > Independent Stream or been pushed into CCR. No problem. And > the "Historic" effort is a huge waste of the community's time, > no matter how it comes out. Well, if this is the prevailing opinion, we can certainly simplify our procedures substantially by eliminating about half of the document states we maintain now, including reducing the standards track down to a single state. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf