On 2011-07-16 03:55, John C Klensin wrote: > (2) Pull the "-advice" document back from the RFC Editor queue > and fold the actual substantive content of the "-historic" > document into it, preferably as a very clear and very prominent > Applicability Statement. I am very strongly against this. The advisory document received extremely strong support and excellent technical input from a wide cross section of the IPv-anything operational community and has been fully approved and is ready to go. I originally hoped it could be published for World IPv6 Day, but having missed that date, it remains urgent to get it out there, and to publicise it to operators who are not aware of the issues. We can spend another few months debating the exact form of words for a normative document advising implementors to do what most of them are now doing; I don't care and it basically doesn't matter except in the IETF's tiny world. That isn't what's important. What's important is to get as many operators as possible doing what they can to ameliorate the situation. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf