yes, but if I'm not mistaken, you already had RIPv2 then. Keith On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:38 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > After all, we moved RIPv1 to Historic when it was still widely implemented, and used in many networks. > Yours, > Joel > > On 7/19/2011 5:34 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 07/19/2011 14:01, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote: >>> Clearly, the view that making something historic when it's in active use is offensive. No standards body could seek to stand behind their specifications, or to give the impression of doing so, with such a position. >> >> Define "active use." >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf