On Jun 12, 2011 11:26 PM, "Michel Py" <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Cameron Byrne wrote:
> > The faint promise of yet another transition mechanism is hardly
> > a motivation to keep 6to4 around. The data (ripe ...)
> > overwhelming proves default-on 6to4 clients + thinly deployed
> > relays = unreliable ipv6 and ipv6 deployment obstacle.
>
> That's the difference between a fait promise and a proven failure. The promise of "IPv6 native IPv6 is going to be deployed next year" has failed for 10+ years in a row. Nobody believes in it anymore; your choices are to believe in yet another transition mechanism or switch to the post-mortem camp.
>
I believe there is data to show this time is different (iana and apnic are exhausted, successful v6day, docsis 3.0 and LTE deployment ...)
> Get a life.
>
Thanks
Cb
> Michel.
>
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf