On May 30, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But you've contributed to this document, so have others from that list.
I don't want to contribute to the document because - in my opinion, and speaking only for myself - I don't think it can be made into a balanced assessment of the issue without major changes.
I do things that the ietf says are a bad idea all the time, I take the concerns expressed in informational documents that I've read under-advisement when I do so.
Since a) I don't have even a fraction of the time I would need to actually contribute said changes, b) the document is already in an advanced state of the IETF process, and c) it doesn't matter so much what the document ends up saying, because most of the organizations for whom this is an issue have already looked at the data and recognized that they have no alternative, I was simply steering clear of the document entirely.
It's true that I have pointed out things I think are incorrect. But I did not view these as contributions, more as offering occasional token opposition lest silence be interpreted as assent. :-) But perhaps you're right and I should not comment on it at all.
Cheers, Lorenzo
|
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf