Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:34:21AM -0700, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> "AAAA ACL" or "V6 DNS ACL" or "V6 resolver ACL" now seem to me quite good 
> labels.  They provide useful, direct and precise meaning, while avoiding the 
> various referential and denotational problems of a loaded term like whitelist.

I have no idea what a "v6 DNS ACL" should be, except maybe an ACL that
protects which IPv6 clients are allowed to talk to a DNS server.

Whitelisting, on the other hand, is the term that Google introduced for
this kind of "thing" and people seem to clearly understand what this 
is about.  "You are on my white list of people that I like talking to!".

Gert Doering
        -- Operator
-- 
did you enable IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]