Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03 *(formal for apps area)*

["Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/31/11 2:48 AM, "Lorenzo Colitti" <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But you've contributed to this document, so have others from that list.

I don't want to contribute to the document

While you have not contributed text per se (by sending it directly), I try to be a good listener and items you and other Googlers have raised have been included in the document around motivations and so on. Even new Sections 3.2 and 3.2 were added based on listening to you and/or your colleagues talk about the issue (and some direct conversations a couple of weeks ago). 

In any case, I appreciate your feedback and opinions. At the end of the day it is only an informational I-D, and not a standard or BCP, so maybe not such a big deal. 

Regards

Jason

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf