Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-05-16, at 18:33, Dave CROCKER wrote:

>>> 2. It is typically a split-DNS private/public mechanism.
>> 
>> No.
> 
> No doubt you can point to IETF documentation or other related, formal documentation of this?

No, and I'm not sure why that's relevant. There's no shortage of examples of addresses encoded in the DNS which can be (and are) used as whitelists. By "typically" did you mean "theoretically"? :-)


Joe
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]