Re: [v6ops] Review of: draft-ietf-v6ops-v6-aaaa-whitelisting-implications-03

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Dave,

I take no position on whether it's in good taste to use the word "whitelist" in this particular instance or in general, but

On 2011-05-16, at 18:21, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 1. It is not previously standardized and I believe it is not documented in an RFC.

the term appears to have some precedent in the RFC series (see <http://www.google.com/search?q=whitelist+rfc+site:rfc-editor.org>, which includes such contexts as DNS, mail, SDP, Atom, v4 and v6 network operations and SIP), and

> 2. It is typically a split-DNS private/public mechanism.

No.


Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]