Hi Ben,
Thanks for your review.
Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-kitten-digest-to-historic-03
Reviewer: Ben Campbell
Review Date: 2011-04-11
IETF LC End Date: 2011-04-15
Summary: This draft is essentially ready for publication as an informational RFC. I have a couple of editorial comments that should be considered prior to final publication.
Major issues: None
Minor issues: None
Nits/editorial comments:
-- Note following abstract:
Will this note stay in the RFC? The note makes me unsure whether the resulting RFC is intended to actually execute the deprecation, recommend deprecation, or start a discussion about deprecation. I assume from the IANA section, you intend the first.-
The note removed and the second sentence of the abstracted reworded to
say that the document is deprecating/moving to historic.
-- Section 1, 7B. "Lack of hash agility."
Can you elaborate on what this means? (I think I know, but I don't know if it will be obvious to all readers)
Some explanation added.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf