On 2011-04-21 17:18, Glen Zorn wrote: > On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: > >> Hi, >> It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) encounters >> so many new hurdles: >> >> 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even >> though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the expiration >> message in html format as the new version to be submitted. >> >> Is there a way to get around this? > > Don't let I-Ds expire? I don't understand Behcet's problem statement. But if it's a bug, please send a very detailed explanation to ietf-action@xxxxxxxx, not to the thousands of people on this list. Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf