Revising I-Ds became painful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
  It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) encounters 
so many new hurdles:

1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even 
though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the expiration 
message in html format as the new version to be submitted. 

Is there a way to get around this?

2. RFC XML has changed. It seem like 
xml.resource.org has a new xml compiler. I had a lot of trouble in compiling my 
existing xml files. I am OK with improving RFC XML but why not keep upward 
compatibility?

Regards,

Behcet

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]