Got it in 1. On Mar 29, 2011, at 1:40 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > > On 3/29/2011 1:31 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: >> Correct. >> >> The interoperability need shifts away from the client-to-server side (for >> example, to the server-to-server side; > > No, that's wrong and I believe it is not what Eric said at all. > > THERE IS STILL A CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL, HANNES. > > ALL THAT CHANGES IS THAT THE CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL IS NOW PROPRIETARY. > > I apologize for shouting. I'm shouting for the classic reason that I'm taking your continuing to misunderstand this multiply-repeated and very basic point as a hearing problem. > > Server-server is an entirely different task and different part of the architecture. > > d/ > -- > > Dave Crocker > Brandenburg InternetWorking > bbiw.net > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf