Re: For Monday's technical plenary - Review of draft-tschofenig-post-standardization-00

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/29/2011 1:31 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
Correct.

The interoperability need shifts away from the client-to-server side (for
example, to the server-to-server side;

No, that's wrong and I believe it is not what Eric said at all.

THERE IS STILL A CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL, HANNES.

ALL THAT CHANGES IS THAT THE CLIENT/SERVER PROTOCOL IS NOW PROPRIETARY.

I apologize for shouting. I'm shouting for the classic reason that I'm taking your continuing to misunderstand this multiply-repeated and very basic point as a hearing problem.

Server-server is an entirely different task and different part of the architecture.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]