[Copying the RFC Editor to let them also check their records] Note that the IANA registry is consistent with http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Mathieu Goessens > Sent: 25 March 2011 21:33 > To: Paul Hoffman > Cc: 6lowpan@xxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and > datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor > > On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote: > > > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by tools.ietf.org > and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org. > >> > >> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version: > >> > >> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt > >> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt > >> > >> Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it > should be reported ? > >> > > > > These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the > page breaks are also quite different. > > > > How on earth did that happen > I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from > this figure. > > I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the > xml2rfc software. > > Regards, > > -- > Mathieu Goessens > IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France > Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71 > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf