Re: Differences between RFC4944 as distributed by tools.ietf and datatracker.ietf / rfc-editor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/03/2011 20:12, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Mathieu Goessens wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> The RFC4944 looks to be different in the version distributed by tools.ietf.org and datatracker.ietf.org / rfc-editor.org.
>>
>> The figure 2 looks truncated on the tools.ietf.org version:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4944.txt
>>
>> Do you know what is the problem ? Document generation problem ? Where it should be reported ?
>>     
>
> These two documents were clearly derived from very different sources: the page breaks are also quite different.
>
> How on earth did that happen
I am not that sure: the page break is different precisely starting from
this figure.

I was more thinking about a different version of configuration of the
xml2rfc software.

Regards,

-- 
Mathieu Goessens
IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes cedex, France
Tel: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 00, Fax: +33 (0) 2 99 84 71 71

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]