Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Agreed.

On Mar 24, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:

> 
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/24/2011 4:49 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:>
>>>>> Another proposal as for your document. So, it fails to mention what are
>>>>> the procedures for reclassification of Standards Track RFCs to Historic.
>> 
>> 
>> Generally, the document tries to limit itself to discussion of what it changes.
>> 
>> There are no changes proposed for moving to Historic. (The question of Historic has not been part of the many discussions about streamlining the standards labeling.)
>> 
>> Hence that issue is out of scope for the document.
> 
> +1
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]