Re: draft-housley-two-maturity-levels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 24, 2011, at 5:01 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> 
> 
> On 3/24/2011 4:49 PM, Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:>
>>>> Another proposal as for your document. So, it fails to mention what are
>>>> the procedures for reclassification of Standards Track RFCs to Historic.
> 
> 
> Generally, the document tries to limit itself to discussion of what it changes.
> 
> There are no changes proposed for moving to Historic. (The question of Historic has not been part of the many discussions about streamlining the standards labeling.)
> 
> Hence that issue is out of scope for the document.

+1

Bob


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]