Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-intarea-shared-addressing-issues-02.txt> (Issues with IP Address Sharing) to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> As you are assuming physical identity of DHCP clients are known
> reliably (I don't know how it can be done), it is a lot easier
> for DHCP servers to assign static IP addresses to the clients
> based on the physical identity information than assigning random
> addresses and map them later through complicated database look up.

As an example, consider a system we built for the IETF meeting network a few years ago.  The server queried a series of tables inside of NetDisco to map an IP address to the WiFi AP that it was connected to:
IP address --> MAC address --> Connected AP
Since the locations of the APs are known, this gives you the location of the endpoint to within a few tens of meters (empirically, within the IETF network).


>> This is an important use case, for example, for ECRIT
>> emergency services [draft-ietf-ecrit-framework]
> 
> Is it a use case in the real world?

The US FCC thinks so:
<http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2011/pdf/2011-565.pdf>

--Richard
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]