Re: Poster sessions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 10, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:

> 
> The costs for a poster session are almost 0.  Isn't this something we
> can just try?

I don't agree that the costs are zero. You can't have the poster session last all week long, because the presenter may want to go to other sessions. So we need about 2 hours reserved for this. Maybe a morning session. 

But then scheduling a WG meeting at the same time is like scheduling a TV series episode opposite the superbowl (substitute your country's favorite sport finals here). And all the ADs would want to go to the poster session, because that's where the action is. So this reduces the amount of time slots that we have in an IETF week.

Also, this puts another constraint on choosing a venue.  You need an area with room for lots of people, and space to put the "booths" or "desks" all around. For example, Anaheim did not have a good area to hold a poster session. Maastricht did. No idea about Beijing.

It may be a cost we agree to bear, but it is not zero.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]