On 10/30/10 9:25 AM, Yoav Nir wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Glen Zorn wrote: > >>> The second biggest thing that IETF could do to raise productivity >>> in meetings is to ban Internet use in meetings except for the >>> purpose of remote participation. >> >> Harder to do & not clearly an improvement: it clear out meeting >> rooms a bit, but on the other hand people who (for example) just >> read email in meetings aren't really harming productivity too >> much. > > They do by skewing statistics. ADs gauge WG position by the feel of > the room. 100 people in the room make it look like there's a lot of > interest, when it fact only the document authors and one of the WG > chairs have read the drafts. Same for hums. Who knows what drives > someone staring at a laptop to hum one way or another? the final arbiter of any test in the room is on the mailing list. disagreement if it is exists is trivially easy measure... ambivalence is harder to measure. in the ipsec case there are potentially quite a lot of people who aren't as concerned about the outcome as they are there is one and that they're going to need to implement. if the filter you apply is that only those with strong opinions should participate that's going to drive outcomes to the margins. > As an example, the IPsecME meeting in Maastricht had over 100 people > in the room. Most never looked up from their laptop screens. > > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf