Re: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Henk,

In a previous discussion about this it was clear that was not the Dutch
railway, but the Belgium one ... However, it was recommended to use the fast
train from/to Brussels, as it was faster than to Amsterdam ... Clearly was
not the case.

The secretariat does an on site visit. It is simple to add one more point
and question about the trains if this is going to be used by most of the
participants (as it was in this case) and actually there is not a good
international local airport.

WE can't recommend train if we don't "sample" it.

And you know, in this case was quite obvious. If you ask in the train
station, as I did (unfortunately too late), they will tell you:

"Oh NO, don't believe at all at the information on the web site, it has not
been updated for ages !".

I think we could have avoided and we SHOULD avoid this mess to the
participants.

Regards,
Jordi




> From: Henk Uijterwaal <henk@xxxxxxxx>
> Organization: RIPE NCC
> Reply-To: <henk@xxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 08:38:23 +0200
> To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: FW: [78attendees] WARNING !!! Re: Maastricht to
> Brussels-Nat-Aero, Sat 07:09
> 
> Jordi,
> 
>> Maastricht proved that the information provided by the train web sites was
>> totally FALSE.
>> This is something that the secretariat/IAOC SHOULD verify before accepting a
>> venue.
> 
> The Dutch railway site (www.ns.nl) is quite accurate.  It lists the trains,
> arrival time, departure time and location where you have to change trains.
> In the 6 years or so that I've been a regular train user, I still have to
> come across a case where the website listed a train that the NS did not
> intend to run.
> 
> Of course, the system is as good as its input data.  If there is a
> technical problem or accident along a path, the website will notify
> you about that as soon as the data is entered.  In practice, this means
> some chaos and confusion the first 10-30 minutes after the incident,
> then decent warning messages appear.
> 
> That said, please explain to me how the IAOC can verify that a train
> sometime in the future, will not run according to schedule.
> 
> Henk
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Henk Uijterwaal                           Email: henk.uijterwaal(at)ripe.net
> RIPE Network Coordination Centre          http://www.xs4all.nl/~henku
> P.O.Box 10096          Singel 258         Phone: +31.20.5354414
> 1001 EB Amsterdam      1016 AB Amsterdam  Fax: +31.20.5354445
> The Netherlands        The Netherlands    Mobile: +31.6.55861746
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I confirm today what I denied yesterday.            Anonymous Politician.
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]