Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once you have established an SSH relationship the protocol allows you
to determine with a high degree of confidence that you are connecting
to the same end point in future.

That is not a perfect security control but it is a very useful one. It
is a much more useful control than any provided by infrastructure that
is not deployed.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Masataka Ohta
<mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>> SSH is not a bad security protocol. It provides a very high level of
>> protection against high probability risks with little or no impact on
>> the user. There is a narrow window of vulnerability to a man in the
>> middle attack.
>
> As a security researcher, I can teach you that the security you
> observe is not of SSH but of return routability.
>
> Return routability over many third party ISPs is not 'verifiable',
> of course.
>
>                                                        Masataka Ohta
>
>
>



-- 
-- 
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]