Re: DNSCurve vs. DNSSEC - FIGHT! (was OpenDNS today announced it has adopted DNSCurve to secure DNS)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> 
>> Not really. I Don't know what you mean by simple nonce, but as I
>> understand dnscurve if implemented properly would have ssh-style
>> authentication.
> 
> Ssh without secure public key distribution mechanism is not really
> secure cryptographically.
> 
> In general, public key cryptography is scure only if public key
> distribution is secure.

Well as far as I know ssh works pretty well today and this model can be
easy made verifiable (i.e. secure as you say) by the administrator
verifying the keys of upstream.

Being "secure" heavily depends on what your requirements are and from
whom you are protecting from. Is a typical bank in europe secure? Can a
general go with an armory division and take the money? Of course he can,
but banks don't consider this a threat.

regards,
Nikos
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]