Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a futuremeeting of the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry if you feel that way. My intent, and I am sure I speak for the 
rest of the IAOC, has been to provide as much clarification as we can
at this stage while acknowledging that many of the comments and 
questions require further work with host etc.

Ole


Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Doug Ewell wrote:

> Ole Jacobsen <ole at cisco dot com> wrote:
> 
> > This is why we asked you.
> 
> Yes, but ever since the IAOC asked us, there has been a sense of "and here is
> the correct answer to give," which itself feels a bit like a PRC election.
> 
> --
> Doug Ewell  |  Thornton, Colorado, USA  |  http://www.ewellic.org
> RFC 5645, 4645, UTN #14  |  ietf-languages @ http://is.gd/2kf0s ­
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 
> 
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]