Re: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meetingof the IETF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What I meant was that it remains for the IAOC to let the survey run 
until October 1st as Marshall said in the original message. Then, 
shortly thereafter, we need to make a decision, based on a number of 
factors, including feedback received on this list, private feedback 
and of course the survey itself, and issue a statement which provides 
more details and addresses concerns, regardless of the outcome of our 
decision.

Ole

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@xxxxxxxxx  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj



On Thu, 24 Sep 2009, Stephan Wenger wrote:

> Hi Ole,
> I don't understand your last two sentences.  Are you suggesting that what's
> left to do is to arrange the China meeting within the constraints of the
> contract, as proposed?  Or are you suggesting that you need to go back and
> attempt to re-negotiate that part of the contract?
> Also, what precisely is there "more to come"?  I hope its not more
> unpleasant surprises :-)
> Regards,
> Stephan
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]